▶ Lawyers’ Involvement in Coercing Witnesses Kang Eui-gu, Kim Sung-hoon to Retract Statements Likely Decisive
▶ Focus Shifts to Foreign Exchange Probe Involving Pyongyang Drone; Investigations of Co-Conspirators, Including Han Duck-soo, Accelerate
Former President Yoon Suk-yeol was re-arrested on July 10 (Korea time) by the special counsel team led by Cho Eun-seok investigating rebellion charges. This marks Yoon’s first re-arrest in four months since his initial detention by the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials on rebellion leader charges was overturned by a court ruling.
Despite personally appearing in court to plead not guilty, Yoon could not avoid his second arrest. Securing the “ringleader” just three weeks after launching the investigation, the special counsel team has gained a foothold to expand its probe into foreign exchange violations, alleging Yoon induced military conflict with North Korea to justify martial law. Seoul Central District Court Judge Nam Se-jin, in charge of warrants, issued an arrest warrant for Yoon at 2:07 a.m. on July 10.
The warrant, requested by the special counsel team, cited charges including abuse of authority, obstruction of rights, interference with special public duties, creation and use of false public documents, violation of the Presidential Records Act, destruction of public documents, violation of the Presidential Security Act, and aiding a fugitive.
After a six-hour and 40-minute pre-arrest interrogation (substantive warrant review) starting at 2:22 p.m. the previous day, Judge Nam justified the warrant, stating there was a “risk of evidence tampering.”Although Yoon denied all charges, the court likely found the special counsel’s evidence—witness testimonies and material proof—sufficient to substantiate the allegations. The team’s argument that Yoon’s actions, such as ordering the creation of a false martial law proclamation document to disguise the legality of the declaration and instructing co-conspirators to delete encrypted phone records to obstruct the investigation, constituted evidence tampering, appears to have been accepted.
Claims that Yoon’s lawyers intervened in investigations of key figures, such as former Presidential Office Chief of Staff Kang Eui-gu and former Deputy Presidential Security Service Chief Kim Sung-hoon, to coerce statements favorable to Yoon, likely influenced the warrant issuance. The court also found merit in arguments that Yoon, facing the possibility of a heavy sentence, repeatedly ignored summons without just cause, maintained a non-cooperative stance in the rebellion trial, and posed a flight risk.
The special counsel team applied five major criminal charges and requested the arrest warrant on July 6. Investigations revealed that on December 3 of the previous year, Yoon convened a partial Cabinet meeting to create the appearance of a legitimate process, obstructing nine Cabinet members’ rights to deliberate on martial law. To conceal the legal flaws of the proclamation, a false martial law document was created and later destroyed.
Additional charges include disseminating false press guidance to foreign media, ordering the deletion of encrypted phone records of former National Conference for Unification chief Yeo In-hyung and others, and using the Presidential Security Service to obstruct arrest warrant executions. Launched on June 12 and initiating investigations six days later, the special counsel team employed its signature rapid pace to secure Yoon’s custody. The team can now investigate Yoon under detention for up to 20 days.
As the rebellion-related charges listed in the warrant were partially substantiated during earlier police and prosecution stages, the remaining detention period is expected to focus on foreign exchange violations. Yoon is suspected of ordering drones to infiltrate Pyongyang to provoke North Korea and justify martial law.
Unverified military testimonies, such as claims that the Pyongyang drone operation was a “V” (presidential) directive, have surfaced. Given the classified nature of foreign exchange violations involving military secrets, specific details of the special counsel’s investigation remain undisclosed. While the team has privately questioned numerous military officials, it noted significant investigations remain, and foreign exchange charges were excluded from the warrant to avoid exposing the probe.
However, Yoon’s consistent disputes over the special counsel’s summons timing, methods, and investigators cast doubt on his cooperation. Proving foreign exchange violations may be challenging without evidence of “collusion with a foreign state,” such as North Korea. Investigations into co-conspirators named in the false martial law document creation and destruction, including former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, are expected to gain momentum. Others under scrutiny include former Interior Minister Lee Sang-min, suspected of ordering media blackouts, and former Justice Minister Park Sung-jae, implicated in post-martial law safe house meetings.
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x